1. |
OMRI Daily Digest - 6 January 1995 (mind) |
40 sor |
(cikkei) |
2. |
Washington Post - NATO (mind) |
107 sor |
(cikkei) |
3. |
CET - 6 January 1995 (mind) |
217 sor |
(cikkei) |
|
+ - | OMRI Daily Digest - 6 January 1995 (mind) |
VÁLASZ |
Feladó: (cikkei)
|
OMRI DAILY DIGEST
Vol. 1, No. 5, 6 January 1995
HUNGARY SAYS OIL SPILL WILL TAKE MONTHS TO
CLEAN UP. An official from Hungary's National Water
Administration on 5 January said it will take months to
remove all traces of the pollution caused by an oil spill in
neighboring Romania, Reuters reported the same day. A
leak from the Romanian Suplacul de Barcau oil field into
the Barcau River was reported on 30 December. Oil spilled
over into the Hungarian part of the river (known as the
Berettyo) earlier this week. Janos Tarjan was quoted as
saying that the slick had polluted a 57-kilometer stretch of
the river in Romania but that Hungary had managed to
contain its spread by using booms and floating barriers.
Hungarian workmen have reportedly removed more than
125 cubic meters of oil sludge from the river this week.
Officials said they thought oil is no longer leaking into the
river but noted they have received no details from the
Romanian authorities. -- Jan Cleave, OMRI, Inc.
[As of 1200 CET]
Compiled by Pete Baumgartner and Steve Kettle
*****************************************************************
A tovabbterjesztest a New York-i szekhelyu Magyar Emberi Jogok
Alapitvany tamogatja.
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*][*] [*][*][*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
[*][*][*] [*][*][*] [*][*] [*][*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
Reposting is supported by Hungarian Human Rights Foundation News
and Information Service.
*****************************************************************
|
+ - | Washington Post - NATO (mind) |
VÁLASZ |
Feladó: (cikkei)
|
Editorial- NATO Expansion: Wait and See
MICHAEL E. BROWN
(C) 1995 THE WASHINGTON POST (LEGI-SLATE ARTICLE NO. 219300)
I take exception to the arguments for NATO expansion made by Peter
Rodman ["4 More for NATO," op-ed, Dec. 13] and Henry Kissinger ["Expand NATO
Now," op-ed, Dec. 19]. Their case for bringing Poland, Hungary, the Czech
Republic and Slovakia into NATO quickly is based on four fundamentally flawed
contentions.
First, it is said that Russian aggression in Europe is highly likely --
"inevitable," according to Rodman. It is certainly true that Russia has a
long imperialist past, but it is also true that Russia does not now pose a
military threat to Central Europe. Russia's military is in disarray at both
the operational and ministerial levels. Western defense experts believe that
it would take Moscow at least a year or two to field an offensive military
capability, should it be inclined to do so. NATO leaders will therefore have
ample time to extend security guarantees to Central Europe if and when this
becomes necessary.
Second, it is said that NATO should extend membership to states in
Central Europe, because, according to Kissinger, they "feel threatened" and
"may drift out of their association with Europe" if NATO membership is not
forthcoming. Poland and Hungary, however, are reducing military conscription,
and the Czech Army is reducing its mechanized and infantry forces. These are
not the actions of states worried about military threats. And although
Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic will undoubtedly be disappointed if
NATO membership is not forthcoming, this would not lead them to turn from
Western Europe and the prospect of joining the European Union. As Czech
President Vaclav Havel observed, "We have always belonged to the western
sphere of European civilization."
Third, it is said that if NATO fails to extend security guarantees to
Germany's eastern neighbors, the "security vacuum" in the region will lead
Germany to forge bilateral ties with these states; a German-Russian
confrontation could follow. No doubt this must be avoided. Significantly,
however, Germany is not pushing for rapid expansion of NATO. Germany's main
concern is that the American urge to move quickly will trigger a backlash in
Russia. If Germany was worried about a security vacuum in Central Europe, it
would be urging the United States to move faster -- not slower -- on NATO
expansion.
The fourth and final argument made by advocates of expansionis that
Russia's response would be muted. This is unlikely. No matter how NATO
expansion is packaged, it would involve American nuclear guarantees to states
in Central Europe. This would be seen by many in Moscow as an aggressive act,
and it would strengthen the hands of radical Russian nationalists, many of
whom reject democratic rule. A return to totalitarianism in Russia would be
more likely. Even if reformers hung on to power, they would have to adopt a
tougher foreign policy line.
In all probability, Russian leaders would interpret NATO expansion as a
delineation of spheres of influence in Central Europe, and they would move to
establish greater control over non-NATO areas. Russian aggression would be
encouraged, not discouraged, by NATO expansion. Four countries would be
brought into NATO, but eight -- including the Baltic states -- would be left
out. Russian withdrawal from the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty
is not inconceivable. A new line would be drawn in Europe, a new Cold War
could ensue, and the West would have itself to blame for bringing this about.
We must not be sanguine about Russia's imperialistic history, its
aggressive policies today in the Caucasus in particular, or the prospects for
democracy in Russia. It is possible that Russia will embark on an
expansionist course in Europe. But it is also possible that Russia will
continue to evolve in benign ways. It would be the height of folly for the
West to undermine this process.
There is no strategic or political rationale for NATO expansion at the
present time. NATO expansion should be tied to strategic circumstances: If
Russia takes steps to threaten Central Europe militarily, NATO should offer
membership to as many states in the region as possible.
Some of the steps that should trigger NATO expansion include: Russian
withdrawal from the CFE treaty; a buildup of Russian conventional forces near
neighboring states in the West; the use of military threats against any
neighboring state; discontinuation of the denuclearization process; violation
of Moscow's pledges to respect Ukraine's sovereignty; absorption of Ukraine
or Belarus into the Russian Federation; or transformation of the Commonwealth
of Independent States into a federal entity.
NATO should declare that it will expand if necessary, but that it will
not expand until strategic circumstances call for this step. This would give
Russian leaders a powerful incentive to pursue benign policies toward its
neighbors in the West.
Some will argue that this course is too risky, that NATO will not extend
membership when push comes to shove. I would argue, to the contrary, that
NATO is more likely to expand if and when real threats to vital interests
emerge, than now -- when the Russian military threat to Europe is
nonexistent. Whatever risks NATO would run by holding off can be minimized by
developing a strong consensus within the alliance on its expansion strategy.
I have more faith in NATO's ability to act decisively in the face of
aggression than in Russia's ability to accept provocation without
retaliation. NATO should adopt a nuanced strategy that maximizes the West's
chances of seeing a new security order develop in Europe and guards against
the possibility of Russian belligerence.
The writer is senior fellow and editor of "International Security" at the
Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University.
*****************************************************************
A tovabbterjesztest a New York-i szekhelyu Magyar Emberi Jogok
Alapitvany tamogatja.
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*][*] [*][*][*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
[*][*][*] [*][*][*] [*][*] [*][*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
Reposting is supported by Hungarian Human Rights Foundation News
and Information Service.
*****************************************************************
|
+ - | CET - 6 January 1995 (mind) |
VÁLASZ |
Feladó: (cikkei)
|
06 JANUARY 1995
Volume 2, Issue 5
REGIONAL NEWS
-------------
**International Outrage at Russia**
Hungary's foreign minister and the current chairman of the OSCE or
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe has condemned
Russia's attack on Chechnya. Yesterday Laszlo Kovacs called for
Russia to stop its military operations in the rebellious region
immediately. Kovacs says that would pave the way for peace
negotiations which he maintains are the only way to resolve the
conflict. Yesterday Russian President Boris Yeltsin agreed to brief
OSCE representatives on the situation in Chechnya. But despite the
fact that Yeltsin promised Wednesday that aerial bombing of the
Chechen capital of Grozny would stop, Agence France Press is
reporting that a bomb hit the presidential palace yesterday. Still a
group of Russian members of parliament says the Chechen rebels are
still in control of Grozny.
**Oil Clean-up Begins in Hungary**
Hungary said yesterday it will take months to clean up an oil spill
in a river at its border with Romania. The oil leaked out of
Romania's Suplacul de Barcau oil field into the Barcau River. It was
discovered December 30th. The slick has polluted a 36 mile stretch
of the river, but Hungarian Water Administration officials say they
managed to stop the oil from spreading with booms and floating
barriers on its section of the river. The Hungarians don't think any
more fresh oil is leaking into the river, but add they haven't
gotten any new information from Romania.
**New Guidelines for Hungarian Workers**
The Hungarian Labor Inspectorate today will unveil 100,000 new
worker safety brochures which are being funded by the US government.
The brochures tell workers how to avoid hazards ranging from exposed
electrical wires to eye strain from squinting at computer monitors.
They're part of a $120,000 labor safety program that's also been
carried out in Poland. According to Hungarian occupational safety
official Janos Gador, Hungarian inspectors who participated in a
training program last spring learned how their western counterparts
combine occupational safety, such as machine safety, with
occupational health, like workplace air quality. Traditionally in
Hungary preventive measures and health risks have been kept
separate.
"It is true they are not authorized to inspect occupational health
in the workplaces. But I think that after these courses even they
look with a different eye at the conditions."
Half of Hungary's inspectors participated in last spring's program.
The rest will have to wait for further US funding before they can
also be trained
**Slovak-Hungarian Relations Warming?**
A delegation from Hungary's three leading opposition parties will
visit Slovakia next week for two days of talks and rallies with
ethnic Hungarian groups. It'll be the first contact between the
three ethnic Hungarian parties in Slovakia and the opposition groups
since nationalist Slovak Prime Minister Vladimir Meciar returned to
power in December. Hungarian Democratic Forum President Lajos Fur
says there'll be discussions on foreign policy issues, the question
of Hungarian minorities and how to improve relations between Hungary
and its neighbors. Fur says despite the nationalist rhetoric of the
National Party he's optimistic that Meciar is interested in
resolving problems with the 600 thousand Hungarians living in
southern Slovakia.
BUSINESS NEWS
-------------
**Hungary Modifies Market**
Budapest Stock Exchange officials say some changes and new tax
laws will encourage investment this year. One new development
could lead to more liquidity in so-called portfolio investments.
Joszef Rotyis, Chief executive officer at the stock exchange,
explains how this will work:
"They can buy a security on the first day of the year
and they can sell it the second day, they can have it all
the year. At the end of the year, the brokerage company or the
bank will calculate your average investment and that is the
average investment you can deduct from your taxes."
Previously, investors had to hold onto securities for three
years, whether or not they still had confidence in the
investment. Making an investor's average yearly balance tax
deductible is designed to maintain trading volumes. Rotyis says
this is an incentive for investors to keep their money in the
exchange longer, even though they can sell away their investments
more quickly.
Another change -- the bourse's 10 percent dividend tax will now
be collected by brokerage houses. The exchange also plans to open a
so-called free market, to encompass large volume companies now
free-wheeling on the over- the-counter exchange. Rotyis explains
what sort of firms will appear here, and why:
"Banks, telecommunication companies, energy sector,
pharmaceutical companies...The market capitalization of that market,
which is outside the stock exchange is 2 and a half times higher
than the market cap on the stock exchange."
Companies on the new free-market exchange will face less-
stringent reporting requirements than those on the bourse.
Rotyis says eventually, smaller companies will enter the free-
market and -- with stepped-up privatization -- many larger firms
will move to the more traditional stock market.
**Pipeline Reopens**
Russian crude oil is again flowing along the so-called Friendship
pipeline to central Europe, following a brief blockage in Ukraine
about a week ago. But the oil will be more expensive, due to a
dramatic increase in Ukraine's oil transit tariff. Russian
exporters claim Ukraine is charging 5 dollars and 20 cents a ton,
compared to a dollar 32 cents last year. Russian oil exports to
the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia have resumed at up to
45,000 tons a day, according to the Slovakian state oil company
Slovnaft.
SURVEY
------
**The Czech Republic's European Union Difficulties**
Poland, Hungary the Czech Republic and Slovakia all see
Austria as a new supporter of their bids to join Europe's most
exclusive club of nations. However the Czech Republic has a
number of potentially difficult issues to resolve with Vienna.
One concerns the Sudetenlanders who became Austrian
citizens after they were expelled from the then
Czechoslovakia after the second world war. Demands for
compensation by Sudeten Germans in Germany have received
support from some members of the German government.
German Finance Minister Theo Waigel has gone so far as to
link German support for the Czech Republic's EU membership
application with progress on the issue. Another possible
source of conflict with Vienna is the Temelin nuclear power
plant, which Prague is building less than 70 miles from the
Czech-Austrian border. Vienna has already expressed concern
about the project. CET spoke with Czech Deputy Foreign
Minister Pawel Bratinka and asked him to what extent he
thought his government could count on Austrian support from
within the EU.
Bratinka: We do hope that they will be willing to share the
benefits of membership with us in the foreseeable future. We
do strongly hope that our membership, although it's not a
question of next year or the next, but it's something that will
take place before the end of the millennium. We don't see any
reason why it should be later.
CET: There have been a few problems with the Germans over
the Sudeten Germans. There are also Sudeten Germans in
Austria and also the Austrians have expressed unhappiness
with the Temelin project. Do you think these are going to be
used by Austria as bargaining chips in their support for Czech
application.
Bratinka: I don't think they will become weighty bargaining
chips. The European Union has been possible only because
most countries in Europe decided to overcome the burdens and
the memories of World War II. If too many of the European
countries kept their memories fixed on what took place in the
war, or before or after the war there would have been no EU.
We hope that those responsible for future negotiations know
that digging up the memories, especially those connected
with war, then European integration would be harmed. And, on
our part we are determined not to contribute to such things.
CET: What about Temelin? Do you think that might be a bone
of contention?
Bratinka: Well, there are many nuclear power stations in
Europe. Some of them are very close to Austria's borders and
whenever we write that fact we are reminded of the fact
that, well, OK, there are many power stations, but they are
equipped with the latest or most modern safeguard
technology. We are also going to equip Temelin with the
latest safeguards and we think we should not be treated
differently than other countries which have nuclear stations
on their territories.
CET: But do you expect Austria just to leave that question
aside or to be a bit harder than that?
Bratinka: Well, you know, politicians are always raising
questions. We are not going to change our position and we
hope that reason will prevail.
ABOUT CET ON-LINE
-----------------
* CET On-Line - copyright 1994 Word Up! Inc. and Cameron M. Hewes.
All rights reserved. This publication may be freely forwarded,
archived, or otherwise distributed in electronic format only so
long as this notice, and all other information contained in this
publication is included. For-profit distribution of this
publication or the information contained herein is strictly
prohibited. For more information, contact the publishers.
*****************************************************************
A tovabbterjesztest a New York-i szekhelyu Magyar Emberi Jogok
Alapitvany tamogatja.
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*][*] [*][*][*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
[*][*][*] [*][*][*] [*][*] [*][*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
[*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*] [*]
Reposting is supported by Hungarian Human Rights Foundation News
and Information Service.
*****************************************************************
|
|